Photo: Pixabay, wendyalison

 

Stunning: Facebook Court Filing Admits ‘Fact Checks’ Are Just A Matter Of ‘Protected’ Opinion | ZeroHedge

Authored by Thomas Lifson via American Thinker (emphasis ours),

Francesco Abbruzzino, The Uncensored Report, LLC

 

 

Surprisingly little attention is being paid to a bombshell admission made by the attorneys representing the corporation formerly known as Facebook, Inc., which has now transitioned into Meta Platforms, Inc.

 

In a court filing responding to a lawsuit filed by John Stossel claiming that he was defamed by a “fact check” Facebook used to label a video by him as “misleading,” Meta’s attorneys assert that the “fact check” was an “opinion,” not an actual check of facts and declaration of factsUnder libel law, opinions are protected from liability for libel.

 

Anthony Watts of Wattsupwiththat explains:

Opinions are not subject to defamation claims, while false assertions of fact can be subject to defamation. The quote in Facebook’s complaint is,

 

 

read more

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.